- 1 What is Hume’s problem?
- 2 What does Hume believe is the foundation of morality?
- 3 What did Hume believe in?
- 4 What are the problems with Hume’s theory of causation?
- 5 What is Hume’s argument?
- 6 What is Hume’s solution to the problem of doubt?
- 7 What does Kant say about morality?
- 8 Is reason a requirement for morality?
- 9 What is the most famous work of David Hume?
- 10 How does Hume define cause?
- 11 Does Kant agree with Hume?
- 12 Why can’t we have cause and effect knowledge according to Hume?
- 13 What is the difference between intuitively true and demonstratively certain?
What is Hume’s problem?
Hume asks on what grounds we come to our beliefs about the unobserved on the basis of inductive inferences. He presents an argument in the form of a dilemma which appears to rule out the possibility of any reasoning from the premises to the conclusion of an inductive inference.
What does Hume believe is the foundation of morality?
Hume’s position in ethics, which is based on his empiricist theory of the mind, is best known for asserting four theses: (1) Reason alone cannot be a motive to the will, but rather is the “slave of the passions” (see Section 3) (2) Moral distinctions are not derived from reason (see Section 4).
What did Hume believe in?
David Hume, (born May 7 [April 26, Old Style], 1711, Edinburgh, Scotland—died August 25, 1776, Edinburgh), Scottish philosopher, historian, economist, and essayist known especially for his philosophical empiricism and skepticism. Hume conceived of philosophy as the inductive, experimental science of human nature.
What are the problems with Hume’s theory of causation?
Instead of taking the notion of causation for granted, Hume challenges us to consider what experience allows us to know about cause and effect. Hume shows that experience does not tell us much. Of two events, A and B, we say that A causes B when the two always occur together, that is, are constantly conjoined.
What is Hume’s argument?
Hume’s argument is that we cannot rationally justify the claim that nature will continue to be uniform, as justification comes in only two varieties—demonstrative reasoning and probable reasoning—and both of these are inadequate.
What is Hume’s solution to the problem of doubt?
He claims that it’s a matter of habit or custom rather than reason. It’s a skeptical solution because it’s compatible with saying that we don’t have any reason for drawing these inferences. The skepticism is skepticism about our reasons for drawing causal inferences. I tied this to the image of God idea.
What does Kant say about morality?
Kant argued that the moral law is a truth of reason, and hence that all rational creatures are bound by the same moral law. Thus in answer to the question, “What should I do?” Kant replies that we should act rationally, in accordance with a universal moral law.
Is reason a requirement for morality?
Reason and experience are required for determining the likely effects of a given motive or character trait, so reason does play an important role in moral judgment.
What is the most famous work of David Hume?
A master stylist in any genre, his major philosophical works —A Treatise of Human Nature (1739–1740), the Enquiries concerning Human Understanding (1748) and concerning the Principles of Morals (1751), as well as his posthumously published Dialogues concerning Natural Religion (1779)—remain widely and deeply influential
How does Hume define cause?
A cause as a philosophical relation is defined as (para. 31): ” An object precedent and contiguous to another, and where all objects *resembling the former are placed in like relations of precedency and contiguity to those objects that resemble the latter.”
Does Kant agree with Hume?
Kant agrees with Hume that neither the relation of cause and effect nor the idea of necessary connection is given in our sensory perceptions; both, in an important sense, are contributed by our mind.
Why can’t we have cause and effect knowledge according to Hume?
Why can’t we have cause and effect knowledge, according to Hume? We can never observe a necessary connection between events. We can never know whether or not the future will be like the past.
What is the difference between intuitively true and demonstratively certain?
Intuitively true means we can see immediately that the statement is true and with demonstratively certain we have to establish this through an intuitive step by intuitive step argument.